KEVWire

Security intelligence, with context.

Response snapshot Oct 27, 2026, 07:21 UTC

Back to the wire
Permalink
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-112395

Pillow tiled-TIFF decoder reads past tile buffer in copy4 (Unpack.c:1290)

Pillow's libImaging `_decodeTile` decoder, used to decode tiled TIFF images, allocates a per-tile buffer using `realloc(state->buffer, TIFFTileSize(tiff))`.

At a glance

Exploited
Not known
Severity
6.5 Medium (CVSS 3.1)
Chance of exploitation
0.4% in the next 30 days
Sources
2 independent sources

What to do

GitHub lists first patched versions: pillow: 13.0.0. Confirm the affected range and upgrade guidance in the exact advisory.

Read GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp (opens a new tab)

What happened

### Summary

Pillow's libImaging `_decodeTile` decoder, used to decode tiled TIFF images, allocates a per-tile buffer using `realloc(state->buffer, TIFFTileSize(tiff))`. After each `TIFFReadTile` it then iterates `tile_y` from 0 up to `current_tile_length` and calls the configured row unpacker (here `copy4`) with the source pointer `state->buffer + tile_y * row_byte_size`.

When libtiff returns a `tile_bytes_size` smaller than the worst-case `row_byte_size * tile_length`, the inner stride-and-copy loop walks past the realloc'd region and `copy4` performs a 1024-byte `memcpy` that reads up to `(tile_length-1) * row_byte_size + row_byte_size` bytes from a buffer sized only to `tile_bytes_size`.

The supplied PoC TIFF triggers a 1024-byte over-read exactly 0 bytes past a 196608-byte allocation. An attacker who can convince a Pillow-using application to decode a crafted TIFF can trigger a process crash (DoS) and may cause adjacent heap memory to be copied into the decoded pixel buffer.

Continue reading

### Details

Pillow's TIFF decoder, when libtiff reports the file is tiled, takes the `_decodeTile` path. The function:

1. Asks libtiff for `TIFFTileSize(tiff)` (the bytes-per-tile) and `TIFFTileRowSize(tiff)` (the bytes per row *as stored by libtiff*). 2. Reallocates `state->buffer` to exactly `tile_bytes_size`. 3. For each tile origin `(x, y)` and each plane, calls `TIFFReadTile` into `state->buffer`, then walks the tile row by row, calling the configured `ImagingShuffler` (here `copy4`) on each row's worth of source bytes.

The validation done before the loop is:

```c if (tile_bytes_size > ((tile_length * state->bits / planes + 7) / 8) * tile_width) { state->errcode = IMAGING_CODEC_BROKEN; return -1; } ```

This rejects oversized libtiff tiles, but it does **not** reject *undersized* ones — i.e. the case where libtiff returns a `tile_bytes_size` strictly **less** than `row_byte_size * tile_length`. The loop body, however, indexes into the buffer assuming the buffer is at least `row_byte_size * tile_length` bytes long.

### Vulnerable Code

```c // src/libImaging/TiffDecode.c:446-490 — _decodeTile new_data = realloc(state->buffer, state->bytes); // bytes = tile_bytes_size if (!new_data) { ... } state->buffer = new_data;

for (y = state->yoff; y ysize; y += tile_length) { for (plane = 0; plane xoff; x xsize; x += tile_width) { if (TIFFReadTile(tiff, (tdata_t)state->buffer, x, y, 0, plane) == -1) { ... }

current_tile_width = min((INT32)tile_width, state->xsize - x); current_tile_length = min((INT32)tile_length, state->ysize - y); for (tile_y = 0; tile_y image[tile_y + y] + x * im->pixelsize, state->buffer + tile_y * row_byte_size, // buffer + tile_y * 1024` already lies at or past offset 196608 — the very last row's `memcpy(in=buffer+255·1024, 1024)` reads 1024 bytes starting `260096 - 196608 = 63488` bytes past the allocation; ASAN flags the very first byte past the heap region (`READ of size 1024 at … 0 bytes after 196608-byte region`).

The mismatch is real: libtiff's `TIFFTileSize` returns the *packed* per-tile storage (which depends on the file's photometric/separation layout — it can legitimately be smaller than `row_byte_size × tile_length`), while the inner loop strides as if the buffer always equals `row_byte_size × tile_length`.

## Attribution

This issue was found by Anthropic from using Claude to study security of open source projects, and I am from Ada Logics helping validate the found issues and report to maintainers. The data in this report has been reviewed manually.

Affected package ranges reported by GitHub: pillow: >= 8.2.0, < 13.0.0

Scores and how they were measured

CVSS base severity

6.5

Version 3.1As of

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L

Measurement source (opens a new tab)

How bad it is if exploited. Not a prediction of exploitation or proof you are exposed.

EPSS probability

0.4%

Scored Percentile 30.3%

Model and measurement source (opens a new tab)

A model's estimate of exploitation in the next 30 days, not certainty or your own risk.

Related technology

Sources

  1. Primary source

    GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp (opens a new tab)

    The public advisory supplies the description, affected package/version ranges, and any listed CVSS metric. GitHub review is not local review.

    Published Checked

  2. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  3. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  4. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  5. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  6. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  7. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  8. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  9. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  10. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  11. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  12. Primary source

    NVD CVE-2026-112395 (opens a new tab)

    NVD record: description, CVSS (the CNA score is preferred), affected products, and publication date. Not evidence of exploitation.

    Published Checked

  13. Primary source

    Vendor advisory (via NVD references) (opens a new tab)

    The vendor advisory referenced by the CVE record, for affected versions and fixes.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  14. Primary source

    NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens a new tab)

    The NVD API page that supplied this CVE record.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  15. Primary source

    NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens a new tab)

    The NVD API page that supplied this CVE record.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  16. Primary source

    NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens a new tab)

    The NVD API page that supplied this CVE record.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  17. Primary source

    FIRST measured EPSS score (opens a new tab)

    Measured EPSS probability and percentile for CVE-2026-112395, scored 2026-10-26. This is a model estimate, not proof of exposure.

    Published Checked

Cite this record

For factual claims, cite the primary sources above; cite KEVWire for its compilation, dates, and classifications.

APA

KEVWire. (2026, October 26). Pillow tiled-TIFF decoder reads past tile buffer in copy4 (Unpack.c:1290) (CVE-2026-112395). https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-112395

MLA

"Pillow tiled-TIFF decoder reads past tile buffer in copy4 (Unpack.c:1290) (CVE-2026-112395)." KEVWire, 26 Oct. 2026, kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-112395.

Chicago

KEVWire. "Pillow tiled-TIFF decoder reads past tile buffer in copy4 (Unpack.c:1290) (CVE-2026-112395)." Last modified October 26, 2026. https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-112395.

Evidence summary (plain text)

Pillow tiled-TIFF decoder reads past tile buffer in copy4 (Unpack.c:1290) (Oct 20, 2026).
Pillow's libImaging `_decodeTile` decoder, used to decode tiled TIFF images, allocates a per-tile buffer using `realloc(state->buffer, TIFFTileSize(tiff))`. After each `TIFFReadTile` it then iterates `tile_y` from 0 up to `current_tile_length` and calls the configured row unpacker (here `copy4`) with the source pointer `state->buffer + tile_y * row_byte_size`. When libtiff returns a `tile_bytes_size` smaller than the worst-case `row_byte_size * tile_length`, the inner stride-and-copy loop walks past the realloc'd region and `copy4` performs a 1024-byte `memcpy` that reads up to `(tile_length-1) * row_byte_size + row_byte_size` bytes from a buffer sized only to `tile_bytes_size`. The supplied PoC TIFF triggers a 1024-byte over-read exactly 0 bytes past a 196608-byte allocation. An attacker who can convince a Pillow-using application to decode a crafted TIFF can trigger a process crash (DoS) and may cause adjacent heap memory to be copied into the decoded pixel buffer.

Pillow's TIFF decoder, when libtiff reports the file is tiled, takes the `_decodeTile` path. The function:
CVSS 6.5 (version 3.1; evidence as of Oct 26, 2026; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-112395).
EPSS 0.4% for the following 30 days, scored Oct 26, 2026 (https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-112395&date=2026-10-26).
Sources:
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMlQxNTo1Mjo1NlrOAAfxiA%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMlQxNDowNjoxNFrOAAfxZw%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMlQwODoyNzoyM1rOAAYp9A%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMVQyMTozNTo1OFrOAAfwCQ%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMVQyMTozMDoxM1rOAAfv2A%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMVQyMToyODowOVrOAAfv1g%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMVQyMToyNDoyMFrOAAfv1Q%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMVQyMDo0NTowN1rOAAfvzQ%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMVQyMDozMDoyNlrOAAfvxw%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yMVQyMDowMzo1N1rOAAfvxQ%3D%3D
NVD CVE-2026-112395: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-112395
Vendor advisory (via NVD references): https://github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/security/advisories/GHSA-462x-pgg6-55fp
NVD CVE API 2.0: https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?lastModStartDate=2026-10-26T20:37:18.143Z&lastModEndDate=2026-10-26T22:10:56.995Z&resultsPerPage=500&startIndex=2000
NVD CVE API 2.0: https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?lastModStartDate=2026-10-26T20:05:59.720Z&lastModEndDate=2026-10-26T21:35:56.549Z&resultsPerPage=500&startIndex=2000
NVD CVE API 2.0: https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?lastModStartDate=2026-10-26T19:31:27.927Z&lastModEndDate=2026-10-26T21:05:56.246Z&resultsPerPage=500&startIndex=0
FIRST measured EPSS score: https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-112395&date=2026-10-26
Record ID: CVE-2026-112395.
Record origin: Ingested record.
AI evidence: Not assessed.
Known exploitation: Not assessed.
Zero-day status: Not assessed. KEV membership alone does not establish zero-day status.
About this data

This record was ingested from a data source. Retrieved: Oct 27, 2026, 01:40 UTC. Ingestion is not an independent editorial investigation.

A CISA KEV listing documents known exploitation, not necessarily a zero-day; absence from the catalog does not prove a vulnerability has never been exploited.

Technology tags indicate possible relevance, not verified exposure. Confirm the affected product, version, and configuration against your own inventory; KEVWire does not scan your systems.

A personal reading checklist on this device, not verified remediation.

Record JSON

Your account

Email alerts

Email alerts are not available yet. To follow your stack today, use its RSS feed, which honors your filters, or connect an AI agent through the API.

Suggest an improvement

Ideas, missing sources, corrections, and bugs are all welcome. No account needed. Suggestions are reviewed by a person before anything changes.

Record details

Record detail