KEVWire

Security intelligence, with context.

Response snapshot Oct 27, 2026, 07:53 UTC

Back to the wire
Permalink
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-112940

filelock ReadWriteLock: SQLite reopens the lock database by name, so a planted symlink or journal file makes the lock user's process overwrite or unlink its own files

`ReadWriteLock` and `AsyncReadWriteLock` (the SQLite-backed reader/writer lock) hand SQLite a name they do not control. On Linux the lock validates its database through a descriptor (the number the kernel gives a process for an open file).

Published Updated

At a glance

Exploited
Not known
Severity
7.1 High (CVSS 3.1)
Chance of exploitation
0.2% in the next 30 days
Sources
2 independent sources

What to do

GitHub lists first patched versions: filelock: 4.2.1. Confirm the affected range and upgrade guidance in the exact advisory.

Read GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8 (opens a new tab)

What happened

`ReadWriteLock` and `AsyncReadWriteLock` (the SQLite-backed reader/writer lock) hand SQLite a name they do not control. On Linux the lock validates its database through a descriptor (the number the kernel gives a process for an open file). It then connects SQLite to `/proc/self/fd/ `, a Linux path that names the process's own open file `n`.

SQLite turns that path back into a plain path and reopens it by name, following symlinks (a symlink is a file that points at another path). On every POSIX route SQLite also acts on `-journal`, `-wal` and `-shm` files it finds beside that name.

Those are SQLite's side files: the rollback journal (pages saved to undo an interrupted write), the write-ahead log or WAL (changes kept outside the main file), and the shared-memory index for the WAL.

Another local user who can create or rename entries in the directory that holds the lock database can turn this against the user running the lock (below: the lock user). Such a directory is a `0777` or group-writable cache, build or project directory without the sticky bit (a directory flag that lets only a file's owner remove or rename it).

Continue reading

That other user can make the lock user's ordinary `read_lock()` or `write_lock()` write bytes of the other user's choosing into the lock user's own files. The same position lets the other user make that call create or unlink files of the lock user, admit a reader beside a writer, or kill the holder. All of this runs with the lock user's privileges.

In a sticky directory such as `/tmp` a planted `-wal` file makes every acquire fail. Affected versions are filelock 3.20.4 through 4.2.0 (the `/proc/self/fd` redirect since 4.0.9, the side-file variants since 3.20.4).

Anthropic's OSS Scanner reported this in private as `ANT-2026-KMJ2575J` [high, CWE-363]: ReadWriteLock: SQLite still follows planted symlinks, overwriting files.

## Severity

**CVSS 3.1 `CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H` scores 7.1 (High).** `AV:L` (local): the other user needs an account on the same host. `PR:L` (low privileges): an ordinary account is enough. `UI:N` (no user interaction). `AC:L` (low attack complexity): the planted-journal variant needs no race, and the redirect won 77 of 77 attempts.

`I:H` (high integrity impact): the other user writes bytes of their choosing into files of the lock user and unlinks files of their choosing. `A:H` (high availability impact): the other user makes every acquire fail or kills the lock holder. `C:N` (no confidentiality impact): the other user learns nothing. `S:U` (scope unchanged): the effect stays within the lock user's own privileges.

Classification from the external review: **conditional security**, a cross-user effect that exists only when another user can change names in the lock database's directory. The review notes that the 77/77 inotify result (inotify is a Linux interface that reports file events) is stronger evidence than a theoretical TOCTOU (a time-of-check to time-of-use race). The scanner rated it high. The review accepts the mechanism and narrows it to that precondition.

## Scope and preconditions

- The other party is a different local account that can create or rename entries in the directory that holds the lock database. That is a `0777` directory or a group-writable one (including a setgid `2775` project directory shared with that account), in each case without the sticky bit. The lock user's lock must be able to open the database read-write, so a database the other user creates is `0666`.

filelock itself creates the database `0600`. - Sticky directories (`/tmp`, `/var/tmp`, any `1777` directory) narrow the finding rather than exclude it. The redirect and the journal replay do not reach a database the lock user owns there (tested with `fs.protected_regular=2`). What remains is a planted non-empty ` -wal` (any mode; a directory or FIFO works too) that the lock user cannot unlink.

It makes every acquire raise `sqlite3.OperationalError: disk I/O error`. A hard link (a second name for the same file) to a file of the lock user at the lock path also remains, if `fs.protected_hardlinks=0`. - Two kernel settings matter. `fs.

protected_regular` (1 or 2 is the systemd default on most distributions; the kernel's own default is 0) keeps a user from opening a file another user owns in a sticky world-writable directory. Where it is 0, the other user can own the database in `/tmp`, and SQLite follows a planted symlink itself (not tested). `fs.

protected_hardlinks=1` (most distributions; kernel default 0) blocks a hard link of a lock user's file onto the lock path. Neither setting affects a non-sticky shared directory. - Platform and route. The `/proc/self/fd` redirect is Linux with `/proc` mounted, 4.0.9 and later. The side-file variants (`-journal`, `-wal`, `-shm`) exist on every POSIX route. On the hard-link route (macOS since 4.1.

1 for every connection, Linux without `/proc`) they need the link-directory swap described under "Mechanism", so a non-sticky parent. Neither the scanner nor the review executed on macOS; the statement rests on the platform branch and the identical code after it. Windows does not take this path. - Ancestor boundary.

Protection against another local user is possible only while no other user can replace the lock's directory or any of its ancestors. That holds when each ancestor belongs to the user or root and is either not writable by others or sticky. A user who can rename an entry in a non-sticky directory above the lock controls every name below it. No file-based lock can defend against that.

## Affected code

At the scanned commit `b831496b0273`: [`_connect_through_descriptor` builds `/proc/self/fd/ ` and hands it to `sqlite3.connect`](https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/blob/b831496b0273ecd11bf02b8d080ca8b673a538c1/src/filelock/_read_write.py#L982-L1001). The assumption is the [comment at line 63](https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/blob/b831496b0273ecd11bf02b8d080ca8b673a538c1/src/filelock/_read_write.py#L63), "Descri

Affected package ranges reported by GitHub: filelock: >= 3.20.4, <= 4.2.0

Scores and how they were measured

CVSS base severity

7.1

Version 3.1As of

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H

Measurement source (opens a new tab)

How bad it is if exploited. Not a prediction of exploitation or proof you are exposed.

EPSS probability

0.2%

Scored Percentile 8.6%

Model and measurement source (opens a new tab)

A model's estimate of exploitation in the next 30 days, not certainty or your own risk.

Related technology

Sources

  1. Primary source

    GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8 (opens a new tab)

    The public advisory supplies the description, affected package/version ranges, and any listed CVSS metric. GitHub review is not local review.

    Published Checked

  2. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  3. Primary source

    NVD CVE-2026-112940 (opens a new tab)

    NVD record: description, CVSS (the CNA score is preferred), affected products, and publication date. Not evidence of exploitation.

    Published Checked

  4. Primary source

    Vendor advisory (via NVD references) (opens a new tab)

    The vendor advisory referenced by the CVE record, for affected versions and fixes.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  5. Primary source

    NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens a new tab)

    The NVD API page that supplied this CVE record.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  6. Primary source

    FIRST measured EPSS score (opens a new tab)

    Measured EPSS probability and percentile for CVE-2026-112940, scored 2026-10-26. This is a model estimate, not proof of exposure.

    Published Checked

Cite this record

For factual claims, cite the primary sources above; cite KEVWire for its compilation, dates, and classifications.

APA

KEVWire. (2026, October 23). filelock ReadWriteLock: SQLite reopens the lock database by name, so a planted symlink or journal file makes the lock user's process overwrite or unlink its own files (CVE-2026-112940). https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-112940

MLA

"filelock ReadWriteLock: SQLite reopens the lock database by name, so a planted symlink or journal file makes the lock user's process overwrite or unlink its own files (CVE-2026-112940)." KEVWire, 23 Oct. 2026, kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-112940.

Chicago

KEVWire. "filelock ReadWriteLock: SQLite reopens the lock database by name, so a planted symlink or journal file makes the lock user's process overwrite or unlink its own files (CVE-2026-112940)." Last modified October 23, 2026. https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-112940.

Evidence summary (plain text)

filelock ReadWriteLock: SQLite reopens the lock database by name, so a planted symlink or journal file makes the lock user's process overwrite or unlink its own files (Oct 23, 2026).
`ReadWriteLock` and `AsyncReadWriteLock` (the SQLite-backed reader/writer lock) hand SQLite a name they do not control. On Linux the lock validates its database through a descriptor (the number the kernel gives a process for an open file). It then connects SQLite to `/proc/self/fd/ `, a Linux path that names the process's own open file `n`. SQLite turns that path back into a plain path and reopens it by name, following symlinks (a symlink is a file that points at another path). On every POSIX route SQLite also acts on `-journal`, `-wal` and `-shm` files it finds beside that name. Those are SQLite's side files: the rollback journal (pages saved to undo an interrupted write), the write-ahead log or WAL (changes kept outside the main file), and the shared-memory index for the WAL.

Another local user who can create or rename entries in the directory that holds the lock database can turn this against the user running the lock (below: the lock user). Such a directory is a `0777` or group-writable cache, build or project directory without the sticky bit (a directory flag that lets only a file's owner remove or rename it). That other user can make the lock user's ordinary `read_lock()` or `write_lock()` write bytes of the other user's choosing into the lock user's own files. The same position lets the other user make that call create or unlink files of the lock user, admit a reader beside a writer, or kill the holder. All of this runs with the lock user's privileges. In a sticky directory such as `/tmp` a planted `-wal` file makes every acquire fail. Affected versions are filelock 3.20.4 through 4.2.0 (the `/proc/self/fd` redirect since 4.0.9, the side-file variants since 3.20.4).
CVSS 7.1 (version 3.1; evidence as of Oct 23, 2026; https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8).
EPSS 0.2% for the following 30 days, scored Oct 26, 2026 (https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-112940&date=2026-10-26).
Sources:
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc
NVD CVE-2026-112940: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-112940
Vendor advisory (via NVD references): https://github.com/tox-dev/filelock/security/advisories/GHSA-v4x8-3wr5-3wq8
NVD CVE API 2.0: https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?pubStartDate=2026-10-12T13:35:55.142Z&pubEndDate=2026-10-26T13:35:55.142Z&resultsPerPage=500&startIndex=6000
FIRST measured EPSS score: https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-112940&date=2026-10-26
Record ID: CVE-2026-112940.
Record origin: Ingested record.
AI evidence: Not assessed.
Known exploitation: Not assessed.
Zero-day status: Not assessed. KEV membership alone does not establish zero-day status.
About this data

This record was ingested from a data source. Retrieved: Oct 27, 2026, 07:41 UTC. Ingestion is not an independent editorial investigation.

A CISA KEV listing documents known exploitation, not necessarily a zero-day; absence from the catalog does not prove a vulnerability has never been exploited.

Technology tags indicate possible relevance, not verified exposure. Confirm the affected product, version, and configuration against your own inventory; KEVWire does not scan your systems.

A personal reading checklist on this device, not verified remediation.

Record JSON

Your account

Email alerts

Email alerts are not available yet. To follow your stack today, use its RSS feed, which honors your filters, or connect an AI agent through the API.

Suggest an improvement

Ideas, missing sources, corrections, and bugs are all welcome. No account needed. Suggestions are reviewed by a person before anything changes.

Record details

Record detail