KEVWire

Security intelligence, with context.

Response snapshot Oct 27, 2026, 03:57 UTC

Back to the wire
Permalink
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-96640

Pillow PDF append accepts malformed shared page-tree DAG causing resource exhaustion

An attacker who can supply an existing PDF to an application that appends an image with `Image.save(..., format="PDF", append=True)` can provide a malformed `/Pages` tree where each level repeats the same child `/Pages` reference in `/Kids`.

Published Updated

At a glance

Exploited
Not known
Severity
8.2 High (CVSS 4.0)
Chance of exploitation
0.5% in the next 30 days
Sources
2 independent sources

What to do

GitHub lists first patched versions: Pillow: 13.0.0. Confirm the affected range and upgrade guidance in the exact advisory.

Read GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2 (opens a new tab)

What happened

### Summary Pillow's documented PDF append path can spend disproportionate CPU time on a compact malformed PDF page tree.

An attacker who can supply an existing PDF to an application that appends an image with `Image.save(..., format="PDF", append=True)` can provide a malformed `/Pages` tree where each level repeats the same child `/Pages` reference in `/Kids`. Pillow treats the graph as a tree and expands each repeated reference in `PdfParser.linearize_page_tree()` without tracking visited or duplicate indirect references.

In the bounded proof below, a `1410`-byte PDF expands to `8192` page references from one distinct page object and takes about `9.6` seconds through the append path. A comparable linear control with the same depth stays at one page reference and completes in about `0.02` seconds.

This is in scope for Pillow's security policy because it is reproducible in `main`, affects the latest public release tested (`12.3.0`), and is not just an unexpected Python exception. The vulnerable operation accepts attacker-controlled PDF bytes through Pillow's PDF parser and causes deterministic resource consumption before normal completion.

Continue reading

### Details

#### Affected versions

- Package: `Pillow` - Ecosystem: `pip` / PyPI - Affected component: `src/PIL/PdfParser.py` page-tree traversal reached from `src/PIL/PdfImagePlugin.py` PDF append handling - Runtime-tested affected release: `12.3.0` - Runtime-tested affected development version: `13.0.0.

dev0` - Tested commit: `b39b9649312fbc381060e8c7c7f9f0de4cc63daa` - Current source artifact hash: `sha256(git archive --format=tar HEAD) = 2ccefca23d432456765be8d3c34564c65ba016b0c9da1e44ca389762f7eda054` - Release `12.3.0` commit: `bb1d8e8ab8d29048624d96e3ee53cecf7c13d13d` - Release `12.3.0` source artifact hash: `sha256(git archive --format=tar 12.3.

0) = 94bed33fd20123938dbc0153d295250bb4e3c09251b6d4a34f7595e25d409c81` - Source-level affected: `5.1.0`, `12.2.0`, `12.3.0`, and `HEAD` - Likely affected range: `>= 5.1.0` - Patched versions: none known

Evidence fact strings:

- Runtime-tested affected: 12.3.0 - Runtime-tested affected: 13.0.0.dev0 at b39b9649312fbc381060e8c7c7f9f0de4cc63daa - Source-level affected: 5.1.0 - Source-level affected: 12.2.0 - Source-level affected: HEAD - Likely affected range: >= 5.1.0, no fixed version known - Pre-boundary note: 5.0.0 has PdfImagePlugin.py but no src/PIL/PdfParser.py

`5.0.0` contains `src/PIL/PdfImagePlugin.py` but does not contain `src/PIL/PdfParser.py`. `PdfParser.py` was introduced by `6207b44ab1ff4a91d8ddc7579619876d0bb191a4` (`2018-01-18 issue #2959: support appending to existing PDFs`), which shipped in `5.1.0`.

#### Technical details

The reachable path is:

1. A service or application receives an attacker-influenced existing PDF and appends an image using Pillow's public PDF save path:

```python Image.new("L", (1, 1), 0).save(existing_pdf_file, format="PDF", append=True) ```

2. `src/PIL/PdfImagePlugin.py` routes `append=True` to `PdfParser`:

```python is_appending = im.encoderinfo.get("append", False) filename_str = filename.decode() if isinstance(filename, bytes) else filename if is_appending: existing_pdf = PdfParser.PdfParser(f=fp, filename=filename_str, mode="r+b") else: existing_pdf = PdfParser.PdfParser(f=fp, filename=filename_str, mode="w+b") ```

3. `src/PIL/PdfParser.py` parses the existing PDF and linearizes the page tree:

```python self.page_tree_root = self.read_indirect(self.pages_ref) self.pages = self.linearize_page_tree(self.page_tree_root) self.orig_pages = self.pages[:] ```

4. `linearize_page_tree()` recursively follows every `/Kids` entry and extends the page list. It does not track page-tree node identity, duplicate references, or active traversal references:

```python def linearize_page_tree( self, node: PdfDict | None = None ) -> list[IndirectReference]: page_node = node if node is not None else self.page_tree_root check_format_condition( page_node[b"Type"] == b"Pages", "/Type of page tree node is not /Pages" ) pages = [] for kid in page_node[b"Kids"]: kid_object = self.read_indirect(kid) if kid_object[b"Type"] == b"Page": pages.append(kid) else: pages.extend(self.linearize_page_tree(node=kid_object)) return pages ```

5. During append, `rewrite_pages()` then iterates the expanded `orig_pages` list and scans/replaces entries in `self.pages`, adding more cost to the already expanded duplicate-reference list.

The missing invariant is:

```text The PDF page tree should be treated as an acyclic tree of unique indirect references before Pillow builds pages/orig_pages or rewrites pages. ```

The proof intentionally uses a malformed PDF page-tree DAG: each `/Pages` node repeats the same next `/Pages` child reference twice. Pillow accepts this graph and expands it as if the repeated reference represented distinct subtrees.

### PoC

Environment used for validation:

- OS/runtime: Linux, Python `3.13.11` - Current tested build: Pillow `13.0.0.dev0`, commit `b39b9649312fbc381060e8c7c7f9f0de4cc63daa` - Latest release tested: Pillow `12.3.0` - The proof uses only synthetic in-memory PDFs and does not contact the network.

Save this as `poc_pillow_pdf_page_tree_dag.py`:

```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 from __future__ import annotations

import io import json import sys import time

from PIL import Image, PdfParser import PIL

def make_page_tree_pdf(depth: int, fanout: int) -> bytes: if fanout not in (1, 2): raise ValueError("fanout must be 1 or 2")

objects: list[bytes] = [b" >"] for object_id in range(2, depth + 3): next_id = object_id + 1 kids = b" ".join(f"{next_id} 0 R".encode("ascii") for _ in range(fanout)) parent = b"" if object_id == 2 else f" /Parent {object_id - 1} 0 R".encode() objects.append(b" >") objects.append(f" >".encode("ascii"))

result = bytearray(b"%PDF-1.4\n") offsets = [0] for object_id, value in enumerate(objects, start=1): offsets.append(len(result)) result.extend(f"{object_id} 0 obj\n".encode("ascii")

Affected package ranges reported by GitHub: Pillow: >= 5.1.0, < 13.0.0

Scores and how they were measured

CVSS base severity

8.2

Version 4.0As of

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Measurement source (opens a new tab)

How bad it is if exploited. Not a prediction of exploitation or proof you are exposed.

EPSS probability

0.5%

Scored Percentile 43.6%

Model and measurement source (opens a new tab)

A model's estimate of exploitation in the next 30 days, not certainty or your own risk.

Related technology

Sources

  1. Primary source

    GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2 (opens a new tab)

    The public advisory supplies the description, affected package/version ranges, and any listed CVSS metric. GitHub review is not local review.

    Published Checked

  2. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  3. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  4. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  5. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  6. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  7. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  8. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  9. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  10. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  11. Primary source

    GitHub public advisory API page (opens a new tab)

    The API page supplied GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2, its actual identifiers, source dates, and structured metrics.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  12. Primary source

    NVD CVE-2026-96640 (opens a new tab)

    NVD record: description, CVSS (the CNA score is preferred), affected products, and publication date. Not evidence of exploitation.

    Published Checked

  13. Primary source

    NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens a new tab)

    The NVD API page that supplied this CVE record.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  14. Primary source

    FIRST measured EPSS score (opens a new tab)

    Measured EPSS probability and percentile for CVE-2026-96640, scored 2026-10-26. This is a model estimate, not proof of exposure.

    Published Checked

Cite this record

For factual claims, cite the primary sources above; cite KEVWire for its compilation, dates, and classifications.

APA

KEVWire. (2026, October 22). Pillow PDF append accepts malformed shared page-tree DAG causing resource exhaustion (CVE-2026-96640). https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-96640

MLA

"Pillow PDF append accepts malformed shared page-tree DAG causing resource exhaustion (CVE-2026-96640)." KEVWire, 22 Oct. 2026, kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-96640.

Chicago

KEVWire. "Pillow PDF append accepts malformed shared page-tree DAG causing resource exhaustion (CVE-2026-96640)." Last modified October 22, 2026. https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-96640.

Evidence summary (plain text)

Pillow PDF append accepts malformed shared page-tree DAG causing resource exhaustion (Oct 22, 2026).
An attacker who can supply an existing PDF to an application that appends an image with `Image.save(..., format="PDF", append=True)` can provide a malformed `/Pages` tree where each level repeats the same child `/Pages` reference in `/Kids`. Pillow treats the graph as a tree and expands each repeated reference in `PdfParser.linearize_page_tree()` without tracking visited or duplicate indirect references.

In the bounded proof below, a `1410`-byte PDF expands to `8192` page references from one distinct page object and takes about `9.6` seconds through the append path. A comparable linear control with the same depth stays at one page reference and completes in about `0.02` seconds.
CVSS 8.2 (version 4.0; evidence as of Oct 22, 2026; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-96640).
EPSS 0.5% for the following 30 days, scored Oct 26, 2026 (https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-96640&date=2026-10-26).
Sources:
GitHub-reviewed advisory GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2: https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-mrfp-p49p-3hf2
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QyMDo1MTozMFrOAAf0Mg%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QyMDo0OToxMlrOAAf0LQ%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QyMDo0NzoxN1rOAAf0Kg%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QyMDo0NTozNlrOAAf0Jw%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QyMDo0NTowNVrOAAf0JQ%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QyMDo0Mzo0NVrOAAf0Iw%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QyMDo0MzozMVrOAAf0Ig%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QxODozNTowMVrOAAZRcw%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QxODozMDoyN1rOAAY_5Q%3D%3D
GitHub public advisory API page: https://api.github.com/advisories?type=reviewed&per_page=100&sort=updated&direction=desc&after=Y3Vyc29yOnYyOpK0MjAyNi0xMC0yM1QxODoyOTowNVrOAAfz8g%3D%3D
NVD CVE-2026-96640: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-96640
NVD CVE API 2.0: https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?pubStartDate=2026-10-12T13:35:55.142Z&pubEndDate=2026-10-26T13:35:55.142Z&resultsPerPage=500&startIndex=8000
FIRST measured EPSS score: https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-96640&date=2026-10-26
Record ID: CVE-2026-96640.
Record origin: Ingested record.
AI evidence: Not assessed.
Known exploitation: Not assessed.
Zero-day status: Not assessed. KEV membership alone does not establish zero-day status.
About this data

This record was ingested from a data source. Retrieved: Oct 27, 2026, 01:40 UTC. Ingestion is not an independent editorial investigation.

A CISA KEV listing documents known exploitation, not necessarily a zero-day; absence from the catalog does not prove a vulnerability has never been exploited.

Technology tags indicate possible relevance, not verified exposure. Confirm the affected product, version, and configuration against your own inventory; KEVWire does not scan your systems.

A personal reading checklist on this device, not verified remediation.

Record JSON

Your account

Email alerts

Email alerts are not available yet. To follow your stack today, use its RSS feed, which honors your filters, or connect an AI agent through the API.

Suggest an improvement

Ideas, missing sources, corrections, and bugs are all welcome. No account needed. Suggestions are reviewed by a person before anything changes.

Record details

Record detail