KEVWire

Security intelligence, with context.

Response snapshot Oct 27, 2026, 01:51 UTC

Back to the wire
Permalink
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-98479

Linux kernel: scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU The Data-In branch of iscsi_tcp_hdr_dissect() resolves the ITT to a task and copies the PDU's data segment into that command's scatterlist without asking whether the command was reading.

At a glance

Exploited
Not known
Severity
7.5 High (CVSS 3.1)
Chance of exploitation
0.4% in the next 30 days
Sources
1 source

What to do

Check the vendor advisory for affected versions and fixes.

Read NVD CVE-2026-98479 (opens a new tab)

What happened

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU

The Data-In branch of iscsi_tcp_hdr_dissect() resolves the ITT to a task and copies the PDU's data segment into that command's scatterlist without asking whether the command was reading. iscsi_tcp_r2t_rsp() in the same file does ask, and rejects an R2T for a command that is not DMA_TO_DEVICE.

A target that answers a WRITE command's ITT with a Data-In therefore has the initiator write target-supplied bytes into the pages that write was about to send. Those are the caller's own pinned pages for an O_DIRECT write, and page cache pages for a buffered one.

Continue reading

Observed against a test target that emits one 512-byte Data-In naming a 128 KB write's ITT, after the R2T for that write. With O_DIRECT the caller's buffer ends up holding 512 bytes of the target's data while pwrite() returns 131072. Buffered is quieter: pwrite() and fsync() both succeed, nothing is logged, and reading those blocks back returns the target's bytes out of the page cache without a command going on the wire.

Check the direction before using the scatterlist, the way the R2T path already does.

Scores and how they were measured

CVSS base severity

7.5

Version 3.1As of

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Measurement source (opens a new tab)

How bad it is if exploited. Not a prediction of exploitation or proof you are exposed.

EPSS probability

0.4%

Scored Percentile 33.1%

Model and measurement source (opens a new tab)

A model's estimate of exploitation in the next 30 days, not certainty or your own risk.

Related technology

Sources

  1. Primary source

    NVD CVE-2026-98479 (opens a new tab)

    NVD record: description, CVSS (the CNA score is preferred), affected products, and publication date. Not evidence of exploitation.

    Published Checked

  2. Primary source

    NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens a new tab)

    The NVD API page that supplied this CVE record.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  3. Primary source

    FIRST measured EPSS score (opens a new tab)

    Measured EPSS probability and percentile for CVE-2026-98479, scored 2026-10-26. This is a model estimate, not proof of exposure.

    Published Checked

Cite this record

For factual claims, cite the primary sources above; cite KEVWire for its compilation, dates, and classifications.

APA

KEVWire. (2026, October 24). Linux kernel: scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU (CVE-2026-98479). https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-98479

MLA

"Linux kernel: scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU (CVE-2026-98479)." KEVWire, 24 Oct. 2026, kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-98479.

Chicago

KEVWire. "Linux kernel: scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU (CVE-2026-98479)." Last modified October 24, 2026. https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-98479.

Evidence summary (plain text)

Linux kernel: scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU (Oct 18, 2026).
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

scsi: libiscsi_tcp: Check the data direction of a Data-In PDU

The Data-In branch of iscsi_tcp_hdr_dissect() resolves the ITT to a task
and copies the PDU's data segment into that command's scatterlist without
asking whether the command was reading. iscsi_tcp_r2t_rsp() in the same
file does ask, and rejects an R2T for a command that is not DMA_TO_DEVICE.

A target that answers a WRITE command's ITT with a Data-In therefore has
the initiator write target-supplied bytes into the pages that write was
about to send. Those are the caller's own pinned pages for an O_DIRECT
write, and page cache pages for a buffered one.

Observed against a test target that emits one 512-byte Data-In naming a 128
KB write's ITT, after the R2T for that write. With O_DIRECT the caller's
buffer ends up holding 512 bytes of the target's data while pwrite()
returns 131072. Buffered is quieter: pwrite() and fsync() both succeed,
nothing is logged, and reading those blocks back returns the target's bytes
out of the page cache without a command going on the wire.

Check the direction before using the scatterlist, the way the R2T path
already does.
CVSS 7.5 (version 3.1; evidence as of Oct 24, 2026; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98479).
EPSS 0.4% for the following 30 days, scored Oct 26, 2026 (https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-98479&date=2026-10-26).
Sources:
NVD CVE-2026-98479: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98479
NVD CVE API 2.0: https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?pubStartDate=2026-10-12T13:35:55.142Z&pubEndDate=2026-10-26T13:35:55.142Z&resultsPerPage=500&startIndex=4500
FIRST measured EPSS score: https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-98479&date=2026-10-26
Record ID: CVE-2026-98479.
Record origin: Ingested record.
AI evidence: Not assessed.
Known exploitation: Not assessed.
Zero-day status: Not assessed. KEV membership alone does not establish zero-day status.
About this data

This record was ingested from a data source. Retrieved: Oct 27, 2026, 01:40 UTC. Ingestion is not an independent editorial investigation.

NVD status: Received. Publication in the NVD is not evidence of exploitation.

A CISA KEV listing documents known exploitation, not necessarily a zero-day; absence from the catalog does not prove a vulnerability has never been exploited.

Technology tags indicate possible relevance, not verified exposure. Confirm the affected product, version, and configuration against your own inventory; KEVWire does not scan your systems.

A personal reading checklist on this device, not verified remediation.

Record JSON

Your account

Email alerts

Email alerts are not available yet. To follow your stack today, use its RSS feed, which honors your filters, or connect an AI agent through the API.

Suggest an improvement

Ideas, missing sources, corrections, and bugs are all welcome. No account needed. Suggestions are reviewed by a person before anything changes.

Record details

Record detail