KEVWire

Security intelligence, with context.

Response snapshot Oct 30, 2026, 17:36 UTC

Back to the wire
Permalink
VulnerabilityCVE-2026-63909

Linux kernel: ksmbd: OOB read regression in smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE-walk loops

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: OOB read regression in smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE-walk loops Commit d07b26f39246 ("ksmbd: require minimum ACE size in smb_check_perm_dacl()") introduced a transposed bounds check: if (offsetof(struct smb_ace, sid) + aces_size < CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE) Since offsetof(..

At a glance

Exploited
Not known
Severity
8.1 High (CVSS 3.1)
Chance of exploitation
0.6% in the next 30 days
Sources
1 source

What to do

Check the vendor advisory for affected versions and fixes.

Read NVD CVE-2026-63909 (opens a new tab)

What happened

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: OOB read regression in smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE-walk loops

Commit d07b26f39246 ("ksmbd: require minimum ACE size in smb_check_perm_dacl()") introduced a transposed bounds check:

if (offsetof(struct smb_ace, sid) + aces_size < CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE)

Continue reading

Since offsetof(..sid) is 8 and CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE is 8, this evaluates to aces_size < 0. Because aces_size is always non-negative, this check becomes dead code and never breaks the loop.

Worse, that commit removed the old 4-byte guard, meaning the loop now reads ace->size (offset 2) even when aces_size is 0-3 bytes. This re-opens a 2-byte heap out-of-bounds (OOB) read past the pntsd allocation during subsequent SMB2_CREATE operations.

Fix this by properly transposing the comparison to require at least 16 bytes (8-byte offset + 8-byte SID base), matching the correct form used in smb_inherit_dacl().

Scores and how they were measured

CVSS base severity

8.1

Version 3.1As of

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Measurement source (opens a new tab)

How bad it is if exploited. Not a prediction of exploitation or proof you are exposed.

EPSS probability

0.6%

Scored Percentile 50.1%

Model and measurement source (opens a new tab)

A model's estimate of exploitation in the next 30 days, not certainty or your own risk.

Related technology

Sources

  1. Primary source

    NVD CVE-2026-63909 (opens a new tab)

    NVD record: description, CVSS (the CNA score is preferred), affected products, and publication date. Not evidence of exploitation.

    Published Checked

  2. Primary source

    NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens a new tab)

    The NVD API page that supplied this CVE record.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  3. Primary source

    NVD CVE API 2.0 (opens a new tab)

    The NVD API page that supplied this CVE record.

    Published Date not suppliedChecked

  4. Primary source

    FIRST measured EPSS score (opens a new tab)

    Measured EPSS probability and percentile for CVE-2026-63909, scored 2026-10-30. This is a model estimate, not proof of exposure.

    Published Checked

Cite this record

For factual claims, cite the primary sources above; cite KEVWire for its compilation, dates, and classifications.

APA

KEVWire. (2026, October 30). Linux kernel: ksmbd: OOB read regression in smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE-walk loops (CVE-2026-63909). https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-63909

MLA

"Linux kernel: ksmbd: OOB read regression in smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE-walk loops (CVE-2026-63909)." KEVWire, 30 Oct. 2026, kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-63909.

Chicago

KEVWire. "Linux kernel: ksmbd: OOB read regression in smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE-walk loops (CVE-2026-63909)." Last modified October 30, 2026. https://kevwire.com/record/CVE-2026-63909.

Evidence summary (plain text)

Linux kernel: ksmbd: OOB read regression in smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE-walk loops (Jul 19, 2026).
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ksmbd: OOB read regression in smb_check_perm_dacl() ACE-walk loops

Commit d07b26f39246 ("ksmbd: require minimum ACE size in
smb_check_perm_dacl()") introduced a transposed bounds check:

    if (offsetof(struct smb_ace, sid) + aces_size < CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE)

Since offsetof(..sid) is 8 and CIFS_SID_BASE_SIZE is 8, this evaluates
to aces_size < 0. Because aces_size is always non-negative, this
check becomes dead code and never breaks the loop.
CVSS 8.1 (version 3.1; evidence as of Oct 30, 2026; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63909).
EPSS 0.6% for the following 30 days, scored Oct 30, 2026 (https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-63909&date=2026-10-30).
Sources:
NVD CVE-2026-63909: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63909
NVD CVE API 2.0: https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?lastModStartDate=2026-10-30T13:52:33.301Z&lastModEndDate=2026-10-30T15:50:56.559Z&resultsPerPage=500&startIndex=0
NVD CVE API 2.0: https://services.nvd.nist.gov/rest/json/cves/2.0?lastModStartDate=2026-10-30T13:06:45.042Z&lastModEndDate=2026-10-30T14:50:57.069Z&resultsPerPage=500&startIndex=500
FIRST measured EPSS score: https://api.first.org/data/v1/epss?cve=CVE-2026-63909&date=2026-10-30
Record ID: CVE-2026-63909.
Record origin: Ingested record.
AI evidence: Not assessed.
Known exploitation: Not assessed.
Zero-day status: Not assessed. KEV membership alone does not establish zero-day status.
About this data

This record was ingested from a data source. Retrieved: Oct 30, 2026, 14:52 UTC. Ingestion is not an independent editorial investigation.

NVD status: Analyzed. Publication in the NVD is not evidence of exploitation.

A CISA KEV listing documents known exploitation, not necessarily a zero-day; absence from the catalog does not prove a vulnerability has never been exploited.

Technology tags indicate possible relevance, not verified exposure. Confirm the affected product, version, and configuration against your own inventory; KEVWire does not scan your systems.

A personal reading checklist on this device, not verified remediation.

Record JSON

Your account

Email alerts

Email alerts are coming as part of KEVWire Premium: join the waitlist. To follow your stack today, use its RSS feed, which honors your filters, or connect an AI agent through the API.

Suggest an improvement

Ideas, missing sources, corrections, and bugs are all welcome. No account needed. Suggestions are reviewed by a person before anything changes.

Record details

Record detail